Skip to main content
Pura SupportCompliance technology
Pura / Operational compliance
Operational compliance

Technical compliance should produce controlled evidence.

Pura's established operational context begins with physical work: inspections, examinations, tests, findings, reports and certificates across defined equipment and engineering domains.

Evidence-ledControlled accessHuman judgement
Operational domains

The work has to remain specific

Exact scope depends on the service, asset population and agreed operating model.

PUWER

Support work-equipment activity and its records.

LOLER

Support lifting-equipment examination evidence and related reports or certificates.

Lifting equipment, plant and machinery

Make equipment, activity, result and evidence easier to retrieve.

MEWPs, tail lifts and hydraulics

Support visibility for inspection, examination, defect and remedial activity where included.

Lifecycle

From physical work to assurance

The lifecycle continues after a report is issued; the record must support the next decision.

Identify

Understand requirement, equipment and activity.

Perform

Complete the inspection, examination or other operational activity.

Record

Capture result and supporting evidence with context.

Resolve

Make defects and remedial activity visible to responsible people.

Assure

Give authorised stakeholders a route to evidence and history.

Evidence and action

Inspection is only the beginning

A result needs context, a defect needs a visible path to action, and an action needs its originating result.

Evidence

Explain what activity produced the record, which asset it concerns and what result was recorded.

History

Give later users context about recurring issues and previous activity.

Boundary

This explains capability and operating model; it is not legal advice or automatic certification.

Workflow, not a screenshot

A controlled path from work to action.

This explanatory model describes the operating relationship. The product-proof section below separately identifies which interface evidence is approved and which remains required.

Requirement
Activity
Evidence
Result
Action
Assurance
Next conversation

Discuss a defined requirement.

Discuss the evidence, access and decisions that currently create friction.

Workflow proof

The physical work needs a visible evidence path

The relevant proof shows how an operational activity becomes evidence, a result and an action. Approved synthetic evidence is shown only where P012 capture and provenance gates passed; remaining proof stays fail-closed.

Synthetic compliance review interface showing controlled inspection checks and results
Compliance reviewThe inspection/check is performed through controlled questions with the result visible in context.
Verified product evidence

Inspection workflow

Capability: Operational compliance

The sequence shows the check being performed, the evidence being recorded and the result producing accountable corrective action.

Verified product evidenceSynthetic demonstration data derived from governed product implementation. It is not statutory, customer or production evidence.
Review the workflow
Defect and remedial workflow
Verified product evidence

Defect and remedial workflow

Capability: Defects and remedial actions

An exceptions view connects an operational finding to ownership, status, required action and due context.

Verified product evidenceSynthetic demonstration data. No customer outcome is implied.
Review the action journey
Evidence provenance timeline
Verified product evidence

Evidence provenance timeline

Capability: Evidence provenance

A record detail keeps activity and provenance context connected so later reviewers can understand what happened.

Verified product evidenceSynthetic demonstration data. No live customer history is implied.
Review evidence provenance